Although smart homes bring convenience to people's lives, their potential privacy issues are gradually becoming a hidden danger. Smart appliances send personal information to corporate servers, and the user profiles stored and shared in the enterprise are used in ways that are beyond the control of the consumer. Today, IoT devices are collecting data from the most private spaces in our lives. Without proper protective measures, all the data collected by the smart appliances will be integrated and then profited by the merchants and stolen by hackers. Therefore, it is necessary to develop strong and legally enforceable regulations to ensure that personal information is protected. Smart hardware investigates our lives without any holes Although the Internet of Things is still in the early stages of development, many products have generated a lot of information. Data show that as of the end of last year, nearly 109 million wearable devices have been put into use around the world, and millions of gigabytes of data are generated each month, and this number is booming. In the arms race to control the Internet of Things, startups and established technology companies are investing heavily in this. Google recently acquired the Nest thermostat, the company to which the Dropcam security camera belongs, and Revolv, the smart home hub control device. In March of this year, Amazon also announced its Dash project. Users simply order the Wi-Fi control buttons installed in the home, and they will automatically order the household items of the relevant brands. Amazon has joined forces with equipment manufacturers such as Whirlpool to prepare the technology for its products – after that, the washing machine can order the washing powder itself! In addition to using the gold dollar, companies even offer rewards to consumers, hoping to share personal data on their smart devices. John Hancock Insurance Company not only gives each life insurance new insured a Fitbit smart bracelet for free, but also plans to exchange users' health information in a discounted manner. While some companies promise to sell smart devices without using the collected data for advertising and promotion, this situation can change at any time due to the lack of management systems. What information should I keep on IoT devices? What information can be sent online? For the consumer, these things are not very clear. When the cat is scratched, the facts can be shocking. Mattel has announced plans to launch a Barbie doll called "Hello Barbie", a smart toy that can talk to children via a remote server in the case of Wi-Fi networking. Parents have of course strongly protested this, and then petitions aimed at preventing toy manufacturers from producing smart toys have emerged. Consumers may not be worried about being monitored by smart hardware, but they need to know if they are being monitored and need to know the usage of the data. But for most people, it's difficult to determine what's going on behind the smart hardware. The privacy policy is basically nothing. Household appliances have not previously had a privacy policy, but now the IoT version of home appliances is accompanied by a large number of legal terms that users need to permit. Of course, consumers shouldn't read the privacy policy to see if smart devices are tracking their personal data, but if users read these policies they will find it hard to interpret. Many privacy policies of IoT hardware are ambiguous, puzzling, and partial. In the absence of sound laws, users' privacy protection on these smart hardware depends largely on the vendor's own The policy. The small number of words on the rules portrays the company's commitment to your data, and the actual effectiveness of these commitments is very weak. The media has been exposed before, LG and Samsung's smart TV opportunities to transfer the content of the user's conversation at home to a third party, and this is the unilateral technical convenience of the TV manufacturer. One of the features of high-end televisions today is voice control, but the TV itself does not have built-in processing power to perform complex speech recognition. So when the user presses the remote control button to initiate voice control, the recorded voice is sent to another partner company, which is exactly the same as Apple's Siri voice assistant. None of these facts show a clear explanation in the policy. Although Samsung clarified its privacy policy after the incident, the technology still maintains the same function. What's even more frightening is that the TV channels of many smart TV manufacturers automatically monitor and identify the images that consumers watch through the screen, and even the DVDs that users play themselves are not missed. These TV opportunities send viewing data to partner companies that are rarely heard by users, such as Cognitive Networks and Enswers. These data collection companies do not evade the use of user data, such as cognitive companies on the official website to describe the way of doing business. They are committed to TV content providers to increase their profits by offering more advertising opportunities to their consumers. Every TV set that uses cognitive technology in the market will continue to benefit TV manufacturers. In other words, in addition to making money by selling TV sets, TV manufacturers can earn money by monitoring user content and sending customized advertisements to users, and selling watch data to advertisers and content providers can earn A copy of the money. Simply put, everyone is making money, only the users are not making money. Intelligent hardware lacks the necessary protection Even if the company does not directly realize the user data, they will put the privacy of the consumer at risk. The user habits and behavior profiles stored in the company server may be exposed to data leakage, and the smart hardware itself is also vulnerable to hackers. attack. HP's HP ForTIfy on Demand security business last year researched 10 IoT products, including smart TVs, smart door locks and smart home alarms. The results show that 8 of them do not require complex passwords, and 7 of them cannot be encrypted during data transmission. The user interfaces of the 6 devices are insecure, and external users can easily reset the password. Although for the initiators, Black IoT hardware requires great patience and expertise. But hackers will share information with each other. Once the weaknesses of smart home appliances are exposed, anyone who has a small amount of professional skills can repeat the blacks many times. Smart hardware manufacturers should learn from the computer industry, and the premise of good digital security is vigilance. As new threats continue to emerge, manufacturers also need to constantly update their products. Given that the Internet of Things has penetrated into people's private spaces, and the trend toward the widespread use of sensors in smart homes, car networking, and wearable devices is growing, it is especially important to build security within the hardware during product design. When the privacy law is not ready for the Internet of Things, users now have to shape the future of these technologies – just buy products that they feel reasonable, and when they feel that the hardware is not right, they will express their opinions. With the expansion of the Internet of Things and changes in policies, it is the consumers themselves who can best protect consumers. Side View Camera,Rear View Camera,Camera Parking,Camera Reverse Shenzhen Sunveytech Co.,LTD , https://www.sunveytech.com