In the past two days, many media have reprinted an article about the latest Chinese aircraft carrier in the French International Strategic Relations Institute translated by a famous domestic newspaper website. The author of this article is Jean Vincent Brissey. In fact, the original title of this article is "China's first completely self-built aircraft carrier between national innovation and international backwardness." From the headline party trend of China's Internet communication, this is a mouth-to-mouth problem. Therefore, when the media was pushed, there was a more resounding topic: France said that China's first domestic aircraft carrier was designed in the 1950s. . When I saw this tall topic, I couldn't help but temptation and clicked in, because this topic is really too horrifying. The article did find this sentence: For Beijing, this new aircraft carrier means a big leap forward, but from the perspective of the construction of the aircraft carrier, this still belongs to the design of the 1950s. Everyone says that the French think romantically, and it is not this wave. Even if the Chinese domestic aircraft carrier did not have any innovation and completely copied the mountain Liaoning ship, then the design of the Varyag was in 1982, and it was built in 1985. In the 1950s, the Soviet Union did not have an aircraft carrier. So the Chinese domestic aircraft carrier belongs to the design of the 1950s, and this argument is simply not established. Even if the history of Russian aircraft carrier development is unclear, let's talk about China's domestic aircraft carrier. Is the French International Strategic Relations Institute a think tank or a stupid library? Some people will say that the sliding deck is not the first in China, it was designed decades ago. However, in the 1950s, there was no aircraft carrier that took off in a sleek manner. Only the National Aeronautics Advisory Committee had the idea of ​​taking off in 1952, in order to avoid the fighters getting heavier and the catapults unable to meet the needs, but the idea The United States has not entered engineering practice. Later in the 1970s, the United Kingdom first designed and developed a sliding deck with a 7 degree tilt angle for the invincible aircraft carrier. If China slips over the source of the deck, it is also the British invincible aircraft carrier. But in fact, the Chinese domestic aircraft carrier, the Liaoning ship, and the Russian Kuznetsov aircraft carrier are not the same as the British invincible ski jump. The former is the sliding takeoff and landing aircraft carrier (STOBAR), the latter It is a short takeoff vertical landing aircraft carrier (STOVL). In the 1950s, was there an aircraft carrier design with a cow fork? Really, this is to say that many Chinese netizens said that the famous American Fletcher class aircraft carrier after the war. This is the first large-angle catapult type aircraft carrier in the United States. It uses steam power and has a displacement of 60,000 tons. It can be equipped with 90 aircraft of various types. This kind of aircraft carrier designed and developed in the United States in the 1950s, is the Chinese domestic aircraft carrier comparable to the Fletcher class aircraft carrier? Seeking truth from facts, it’s really not comparable, and it’s not a star or a half. In addition to the performance of the æ¼-15 carrier aircraft, the domestic aircraft carrier is slightly inferior, and it is in a downturn in terms of displacement, load capacity and efficiency. The Fryscher class aircraft carrier of the US military 60 years ago is more advanced than the Chinese domestic aircraft carrier. If China's first domestic aircraft carrier is such a "design of the 1950s," many Chinese military fans must wake up dreaming. But can you say that Chinese domestic aircraft carriers are not designed as in the 1950s? If you follow the criteria of the title party, it is not a bad idea to do so. But this kind of ratio is completely meaningless. Because it has been more than 60 years, the methods and methods of the Chinese aircraft carrier formation have changed a lot since the beginning of the US Army Fletcher class. Now many weapons and technologies of the domestic aircraft carrier are not available 60 years ago. Therefore, the design gap does not represent a measure of combat effectiveness. Therefore, the article of this French "think tank" researcher really made the author unable to understand. Is the raging panic crisis really scaring European scholars? In order to make it clear, the author finally found the original French text of this article. At first glance, it was found that the level of French experts was not low, but the pits of Chinese translation. The article published on the website of the French Institute for International Strategic Relations on April 28th, the original text is: Pour Pékin, ce nouveau bateau représente donc un bond en avant mais pour la construcTIon de porte-avions en général, cela reste du matériel dont la concepTIon Date d'une quarantaine d'années. The general meaning is that for Beijing, this new aircraft carrier means a big leap forward, but it has been behind the design concept for 40 years. This is completely right. In the 1970s, it was the time when the Kuya and Varyag aircraft carriers were designed, so the French people said it was not bad. However, after the Chinese translation, it misinterpreted the original intention. Compared with before the reform and opening up, the breadth and depth of China's current foreign exchanges cannot be compared. Every day, too much information enters the country, and due to language differences, translation errors are prone to occur. In fact, the mistaken translation of French think tank articles is still from the famous "Some News" newspaper website in China. The translation level of this newspaper is first class in China. The reason why such mistakes occur, in addition to translation errors, may also be the reason for the lack of relevant military knowledge. If you have a little understanding of the history of China and the world's aircraft carriers, you should judge that there is a problem with the phrase "still belonging to the design of the 1950s." Although there are mistakes, the author still has to say that this is only a technical error. Compared with some people who make up the foreign military rumors on the Internet, these erroneous translations can be said to be "conscience". Therefore, in today's highly developed media information, we can't say rumors everywhere. The vast number of netizens must have a clear understanding of the realism of compiling foreign military news in China, especially the sensational news about Chinese military technology. Biased.
Fiber Optical Splice Closure(FOSC) is provided to provide a solid protection for fiber optic splice points, YULIANG Telecom offers a full range, various models of FOSC with both Inland type and DOME types, YULIANG Telcom FOSC are applied for underground, aerial, pipeline, manhole with protection level reaches IP68.
Fiber Optic Splice Closure,Fiber Splice Enclosure,Optical Fiber Splice Closure,Fiber Optical Splice Closure NINGBO YULIANG TELECOM MUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT CO.,LTD. , https://www.yltelecom.com
